Review Policy

The process of the analysis of the proceedings of the conference is orientated on establishment of the degree of their value, originality, actuality and scientific expediency for the prerogatives of the Collection of Proceedings, fitness of manuscript for a publication with taking into account the requirements of the Committee on ethics in publications – Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and by support on experience of leading scientific concords; on the increase of high quality of the printed matters, overcoming of prejudice and injustice at a rejection or acceptance of the scientific papers.

The aim of the review is standard-setting of authorial manuscripts quality.

The tasks of the review consist in verification of:

general scientific level of the proceedings papers, in particular research actuality, presence of problem in it, its meaningfulness for decision of the important scientific and practical tasks, correctness and expediency of methods application at the conducted researches, level of generalization at formulation of research conclusions and others like that;
semantic filling and framework of the proceedings papers;
correctness of the use of professional (special) vocabulary and others like that.
In Collection of Proceedings of the Conference the regulation of single-blind review (if necessary – double «blind» (anonymous) criticizing is observed): the authors are not revealed to the names of reviewers, the reviewers are not revealed to the names of authors. Co-operation of reviewers and authors is carried out only through the members of release.

Release nobody reveals the information which touches a manuscript (table of contents, process of criticizing, critical remarks of reviewers, final decision), except the members of editorial college of the Collection of Proceedings, the author and reviewers.

Reviews appear only to the members of editorial board of the Collection of Proceedings and author, Reviews appear only to the members of editorial board of Collection and author.

Positive reviews, which assure the possibility of publishing of the proceedings are made public on the sittings of International Editorial Council and Editorship.